7 218
editací
Sustainable Surfboards: Porovnání verzí
Skočit na navigaci
Skočit na vyhledávání
m
formátování
m (added Category:Sport a životní prostředí using HotCat) |
m (formátování) |
||
| Řádek 33: | Řádek 33: | ||
*Bio-based resin, however, cannot be 100% ecological because it is based on petrol. Surfboard constructors argue that bio-based resins are good but have also some disadvantages such as higher price, lower strength and not being as white as epoxy resins (Vartiainen, 2018). | *Bio-based resin, however, cannot be 100% ecological because it is based on petrol. Surfboard constructors argue that bio-based resins are good but have also some disadvantages such as higher price, lower strength and not being as white as epoxy resins (Vartiainen, 2018). | ||
==== | ==== Finishing – Natural fibers ==== | ||
In normal surfboards, fiberglass is used. The overall CO2 footprint contribution of fiberglass is only 5%. Thus, alternatives to fiberglass are unlikely to result in any major environmental benefit through displacing fiberglass alone. However, alternatives to fiberglass exist: woven bamboo cloth, hemp cloth, and bamboo veneer. These alternatives have varying impacts on performance, durability, and visual appearance. | In normal surfboards, fiberglass is used. The overall CO2 footprint contribution of fiberglass is only 5%. Thus, alternatives to fiberglass are unlikely to result in any major environmental benefit through displacing fiberglass alone. However, alternatives to fiberglass exist: woven bamboo cloth, hemp cloth, and bamboo veneer. These alternatives have varying impacts on performance, durability, and visual appearance. | ||
| Řádek 47: | Řádek 47: | ||
== Reference == | == Reference == | ||
*Barcelos, R. L., Magnago, R. F., & Leripio, A. A. (2018). Analysis of the technological impact on industry and its effects on waste production and disposal: a case study of the surfboard manufacturing industry. ''Ciência e Natura'', ''40''(0), 49. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X31540</nowiki> | |||
*Brodeur, M., Brunet, P., & Primiani, C. (2011). Naturally Gnarly: The all-natural surfboard. ''Montreal: Mcgill''.</blockquote> | |||
*Mateus, M. M., Bordado, J. M., & dos Santos, R. G. (2017). Ultimate use of Cork – Unorthodox and innovative applications. ''Ciência & Tecnologia Dos Materiais'', ''29''(2), 65–72. <nowiki>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.03.005</nowiki> | |||
*Michelena, A. H., Graham-Jones, J., Summerscales, J., & Hall, W. (2016). Eco-friendly Flax Fibre/Epoxy Resin/Composite System for Surfboard Production. In R. Fangueiro & S. Rana (Eds.), ''Natural Fibres: Advances in Science and Technology Towards Industrial Applications'' (pp. 267–277). Springer Netherlands. | |||
*Moss Research Announces “Industry-First” Sustainable Surfboards. (2011, January 25). Retrieved 9 April 2019, from SURFER Magazine website: <nowiki>https://www.surfer.com/blogs/industry-news/moss-research-announces-%e2%80%9cindustry-first%e2%80%9d-sustainable-surfboards/</nowiki> | |||
< | *Sullivan, S. (2007). Sustainable Surfboards. ''Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection''. Retrieved from <nowiki>https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/724</nowiki> | ||
*The Ecoboard Lifecycle Study |. (2016). Retrieved 9 April 2019, from <nowiki>http://sustainablesurf.org/2016/06/the-ecoboard-lifecycle-study/</nowiki> | |||
*Vartiainen, N. (2018). ''THE NEW WAVE OF SUSTAINABLE SURF INDUSTRY''. 71. | |||
*Woody, T. (2009, November 18). Green Foam Blanks Tries to Limit Toxin From Making Surfboards. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved from <nowiki>https://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/business/energy-environment/19SURF.html</nowiki> | |||
[[Kategorie:Sport a životní prostředí]] | [[Kategorie:Sport a životní prostředí]] | ||